Star Wars Zero Company arrives on 27 August: a single-player, turn-based tactics game set in the last stretch of the Clone Wars, made by a studio staffed with the people who built the modern XCOM.
Who Is Actually Making It
Bit Reactor was founded by Greg Foertsch, who spent 22 years at Firaxis Games as art director across XCOM: Enemy Unknown, XCOM 2 and multiple Civilization titles. Roughly two dozen of the studio’s developers came off the modern XCOM series. Respawn Entertainment is producing, and Foertsch has said the project started with a call from Respawn boss Vince Zampella. Electronic Arts is publishing.
That pedigree sets an expectation, and the studio seems aware of it. PC Gamer, which has played it, argues it lands closer to Mass Effect than to XCOM in feel, turn-based tactics and permadeath included.
The Tactics Layer
The combat screens are legible to anyone who has played the genre: cover states, flanking, per-unit action economy, and a big Overwatch prompt sitting under the squad. Abilities carry the Star Wars specificity you would want, with an Impact Bomb listed as a fast action limited to two per combat, and objectives that read like Separatist clean-up work rather than generic map clears.

The Holotable Is the Other Half
Between missions there is a strategic layer run off a holotable: Influence, Operations and Missions tracked across regions, a Den Level to raise, Intel to bank, and crisis missions that expire if you ignore them. One example on screen offers a chance to destroy a prototype upgrade before it rolls out across an enemy organisation, with rewards in Den Level and Intel.
That is the XCOM lesson applied properly. The tactical layer is only tense if the strategic layer is making you choose which fire to leave burning.

The EA Question
Zero Company ships 23 days after EA becomes a privately held company owned by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, Silver Lake and Affinity Partners, carrying a reported $20 billion of buyout debt. Zero Company is single-player, finite, has no live-service hooks and no obvious recurring revenue. It is exactly the category of game people are worried about under that ownership structure.
Which makes it worth paying attention to for two reasons at once. It looks like a good tactics game from people with the receipts to make one. It is also going to be read, fairly or not, as an early data point on what the new EA does with things that only sell once.




PLAYER COMMENTS
LOADING...